Here are a couple of documents from the thousands we have. This is an email to Tony Wright MP for Cannock Chase dated 25th July 2009 and his assistant Susan Woodward who is standing as a prospective MP in the next general election. You will note I point out to Wright MP he is as bent as a nine bob note as is his assistant Susan Woodward for helping and aiding Bliar, Brown, Chief Constables etc to cover up massive fraud.
Just a quick email to Tony Wright MP reminding him of why he refuses to reply to any of my letters or requests, in 2007 i believe it was after contacting Wright MP under the FOI ACT he claimed all MPs were exempt from this act and anyway he destroys all of his documents both received and sent after two years, do you believe that?? nahhhhhhhhhh me neither.
Letter to Chief Constable Lee dated 17th July 2009 under the heading "request being made under the freedom of information act"
I am confirming I have sent copies of my letters to Sims and the reply from Carl Bird to Lee. I am pointing out I am still waiting for the crime report number made by PC Alcott on the 4th December 1994. I inform Lee that Sims claims the car was never registered to West Midlands police CID, so why am I still waiting for a crime report number from Staffs police freedom of information office on the 26th July 2009??
Again even of today's date the 18th of September 2009 I am still waiting for a reply from the Chief Constable of Staffordshires FOI office to my requests, I wrote to Chief Constable Cunningham on today's date 18/9/09 reminding him the 40 day time limit for replies to FOI requests is long past. Do you think he will supply me with the crime report number I have asked for?? or is he going to be as bent and corrupt as the Chief Constables before him??
This is a letter to Chief Constable Sims of West Midlands police dated 11th July 2009. Sims was recently the Chief Constable of Staffordshire police force.
Again the letter to Sims was headed as request made under the freedom of information act. I state very clearly that Sims is as bent as a nine bob note. This remark wasn't made lightly as I respect the police and customs officers who have helped me many times in the past. There is a hard core of corrupt officers whose actions are covered up by the likes of Sims, Bliar, Brown, Wright MP etc. This letter is in reply to the letter had received from Carl Bird the so-called freedom of information officer for West Mids police force.
You can see in the contents of this letter I am stating Mr Bird is a liar. I also sent both Sims and Bird several documents of proof of bent officers plus a copy of photos of an envelope I collected from Cannock police station archives officer. The envelope contained my two taped cautioned statements made to DC Daniels at Cannock Police station. I made a decision that I wouldn't open or reveal the contents of the tapes until I could prove beyond any doubt that the cover ups went right to Number Ten. That has now been achieved, requests have been made to people who are straight and honest to be in attendence when the envelope is opened.
I have to ask why no national, local newspaper will print my claims plus why does the television media refuse to get involved even though reporters have stated my claims and documents are dynamite??
Thousands of honest campaigners including ex special branch officers can't all be wrong, can they? :)
This is a letter from Carl Bird dated 9th July 2009 in reply to my freedom of information request. You can see he claims the car I refer to never belonged to West Mids police CID.
I faxed Mr Bird a reply letter plus a bundle of documents. The same were sent to Chief Constable Sims and Lee of Staffordshire police force on the 17th July 2009. Still waiting for a reply.
On the evening of the 7th of December 1994 a PC Tony Alcott and a WPC came to my home at 11-05pm in relation to an offence, PC Alcott was given the cars registration, its colour and make and model, on first calling this info in he was told the car wasn't registered with the DVLA, on receiving a second call on his radio PC Alcott was informed that the car was registered to West Midlands Police CID. PC Alcott on leaving my home stated he would register the crime report number when he returned to the police station and further someone would be out to interview me as this was a serious offence against a minor.
Now Chief Constable Sims of West Mids police claims the car was never registered to this force, it will be interesting to hear his reaction to the other four car registrations being put out.
Letter to acting Chief Constable Lee of Staffs police force dated 29th June 2009. It was a request being made under the freedom of information act.
I am requesting the crime report number recorded in Cannock police station records for the night of the 7th December 1994 when an attempted abduction was carried out on my 14 year old daughter. I have been informed since this date it was a scare tactic used and that it wasn't a real attempted abduction but a scare tactic to make me back off from my campaign. Remember the old KGB, stasi, gestapo etc? Its equivalent here in the UK alive and kicking.
Why has Chief Constable Sims freedom of information officer contacted me claiming the car was never registered to West Mids police CID, yet Lee hasn't replied to my request yet?? Now they have a problem conspiring to try to cover up the truth is why.
Yet again look at the date of this request and ask yourself why I have not received a reply from Staffordshire police force regards this matter? why am I still waiting for replies from Staffordshire police force Professional Standards unit (there lies a joke) I was informed on the 3rd of February 2009 that a letter had been sent to me on the 6th January 2009 by this unit, christ knows which way its been sent to get here but its certainly not by our mail service.
This is the same unit that on arriving at my home in 2007 stated firmly Chief Constable Swift I believe it was then is not going to allow your claims to be investigated. I say I believe because Staffs Chief Constables etc keep resigning
Letter sent to me c/o the Chief Executive of the IPCC this clowns case managers informed me that the IPCC believed the police professional standards units were better placed to investigate claims against bent police officers than the IPCC were.
The IPCC was set up by Bliar because the old Police Complaints Authority was being over run with complaints he then set up the IPCC which is run by serving and ex police officers and students so if you have ever complained to the IPCC and have been told to get lost thats the reason why.
Bliar decided that when the IPCC was set up by him in 2004 or 2005 no crimes before the set up date could be investigated that had been committed by police officers. Yet criminal acts by police officers or any one else have no time limits. I received a letter from DI Booth of West Midlands Police Complaints Unit informing me before I had even heard from the IPCC themselves that the IPCC had told Booth she could drop the investigation into my claims against West Mids police officers, see how it works, Booth then in a letter calls me vexatious because I still demanded an investigation.
So when innocents are getting murdered and mugged look no further than the likes of Sims and Booth.
This is a letter from Swift and his legal advisor after Swift had been made fully aware of what documents both he and Gifford had signed for. This letter is dated 2nd of February 2007. As can be read Swift has now gone from prosecuting this party for its telling of lies about Swift and Gifford to now stating they will not respond to this party or Roy Jenkins anymore. Amazing, you couldn't make it up if you tried.
Both Chief Constable Gifford and Swift have signed for many documents of evidence of criminal acts since 2000, they have been made fully aware of my claims which they have ignored. They have also ignored ALL of the bundles of evidence they signed for. Swift and Gifford were given copies of tapes and documents concerning West Mids Police C division which was disbanded due to corruption by its officers that were covered up by Chief Constable Crew and his senior officers and legal dept.
Mr Swift wrote to me on behalf of the Chief Constable Gifford concerning the documents and tapes Gifford had signed for. Swift claimed he had spoken to the other forces and customs about the claims made by me and that he had been informed that on investigation these same forces claimed the matters had been dealt with. I have asked Swift how he managed to carry out his investigations into my claims as these other forces and customs he claimed he had liaised with had all told me that all of the documents and files relating to him and his allegations had been distroyed?
Further, in a second incident concerning Gifford and Swift, Gifford passed my faxed letter and documents relating to criminal acts to Swift for him to deal with. I received a letter at the beginning of January 2004 from Swift stating he was investigating his claims and would get back to him in the near future. In November of 2004, after I contacted Gifford to ask him why it was taking so long to get back to him, Swift replied on behalf of Gifford claiming that my documents had been overlooked from January of 2004 and that Gifford didn't intend to do a thing about the claims. This same Mr Swift wrote to me claiming his office had lost the file that had been sent to him and could I fax them to him yet again. The losing of files and documents of Roy Jenkins is rife by government authorities. Brief examples will be shown in this brief write up.
We repeat you have to remember these are the same people that are supposed to look after your safety and interests this party is exposing, exactly how they fail and why. It will show these people are more interested in their knighthoods and pensions and jollies than they are in you.
Many more documents will be displayed on this site as it goes along, but this brief resume shows you what a lousy police force Staffordshire has. It has just been revealed this force has lied about crime figures, this site will show how crimes committed recently have not been recorded by Swift and that this is obviously an ongoing situation. This party wishes it to be known that ordinary police officers can't be blamed for any of the above. They are forced by their bosses to follow instructions. I have spoken to hundreds of good officers who can tell you to the day when they will retire, they also are sick and tired of the direction taken by senior officers who are more interested in target figures than solving and preventing crimes against the public.
Mr Swift and Gifford and Griffiths the legal advisor to Mr Swift have been asked to reply to my faxed letters to them in which I has asked any of them if what I have stated is untrue would they please contact him with proof of what is untrue and then neither this party nor I will use or print anything that is proved to be untrue. So far none of these gentlemen have replied!
Mr Swifts Freedom of Information Office recently told me he couldn't have any of the documents he had asked for concerning the alleged investigations held by Gifford, Swift, Cannock CID and Staffs Fraud Squad into his claims. After informing Mr Swift and his legal advisor Mr Griffith what documents and tapes they had signed for I have now received a further letter from the Staffs police Freedom of Information Act unit stating they are looking into his request again.
Staffordshire police force recently wrote articles that were printed in local newspapers claiming how good their record was in solving crimes. This was quickly disproved in a local paper. Chief Constable Swift states in local newspapers that 85% of the population of Staffordshire are happy with the police work. Who gave him these figures because at the General Election in 2005 and since then I couldn't find one person who had a good word to say about the police. I remarked concerning the 2005 general election are retained in local papers libraries where he talks about the police. I am still waiting for replies from Inspector Derrick of Cannock police station concerning an incident in 2006. Again evidence was given to the police and nothing done. This is just one incident that I have been gathering.
I had told Griffiths that he was the organ grinders monkey who would do anything he was told be it right or wrong.
This is a letter from Chief Constable Swift dated 19th January 2007 to me.
As has been pointed out at the beginning of the website, I, along with many others are making a determined effort to get rid of this corruption, the using of documents from various authorities is simply to expose the truth of what is going on in England and why. If it was for personal benefit as Bliar or others may claim then why have the documents and tapes not been sold by me?
In this letter you will see that Mr Swift threatens me and accuses him of using false claims against Mr Swift and ex Chief Constable Gifford who took sudden early retirement last year. This is believed to be because Gifford had been made aware of various names being released and cover ups by Chief Constables etc. You will see that Chief Constable Swift on page one claims he couldn't identify any discernable complaint being made against the police etc by me. It is also shown that Swift accuses me of making wild and disparate allegations of fraud and corruption against various individuals.
On page two Swift refers to this parties campaign leaflets being circulated and that the remarks made in these leaflets could be considered libelous in relation to Swift, Gifford and others. Swift claims this party was making unfounded allegations of dishonesty etc by police officers and others and that if this party continued to make these claims in its party leaflets, Swift would have no hesitation in taking immediate redress through the courts.
The first thing I did on receiving this letter was to contact Chief Constable Swift and his legal advisor Mr Griffith by fax and to hand deliver documents to Staffordshire Police headquarters on the Cannock Road, Stafford for the personal attention of Swift and Griffiths. In the documents handed to the police headquarters and by fax were several signed receipts from ex Chief Constable Gifford and Swift dating back to 2000 to confirm they had received copies of tapes of corrupt police and customs officers, they had received documents including transcripts taken from the taped conversations confirming the corruption by police and customs officers. They signed for a document from the Cannock police archives confirming that a two taped voluntary cautioned statement had been made by me to DC Daniels at Cannock police station in January of 2000 on which corrupt officers were named, they signed for documents showing criminal acts commited by the Bradford and Bingley that were covered up by Staffordshire Chief Constables, and they signed for a court document showing that the Bradford and Bingley had been in contempt of court in January of 2005.
In the letter Chief Constable Swift informs me that he has sent a copy of this letter dated 19th January 2007 to Wright MP for Cannock Chase for Wright to forward to the Electoral Commission. I have asked Swift why he has done this, as the contents of his documents and Swifts letters have nothing at all to do with Wright or the Electoral commission. Mr Swift has been asked, has he done this on the advice of Wright MP? Swift refuses to reply. These are the actions of a police state.
I then received the following letter from Swift and his legal advisor Mr Griffith.
I have repeatedly requested of Bliar, Brown, Wright MP, Chief Constables etc if my claims are false then why have they not arrested me for libel. The answer is simple. YOU CAN'T PROSECUTE THE TRUTH.
I have remarked on this letter on another part of this parties site it is self explanatory really.
This is a letter from Nattrass MEP for the West Midlands, at a meeting with this man in which I expressed my anger that millions were losing their homes and jobs, he was also given documents showing fraud in the EU, he sat opposite me at this meeting and stated that Bliar and the police wouldn't know what had hit them once he got started on this and he would leave no stone unturned until it was sorted. Still waiting Mr. Natrass like Farage you are all wind and pith, still the EU perks come in handy don't they
This is a letter I received from the Chief Constable of Staffordshire I had sent him copies of false statements of truth some made by Paul Jordan the head of legal services for the Bradford and Bingley that was used in the likes of HHJ Rubery's court. Jordan admitted in writing that the remarks he had made were untrue in his statement of truth/witness statements, he then claimed in a letter that he had signed these false statements after they had been written by one of his staff and he hadn't bothered to read the contents first. What does a solicitor tell you that before you sign any document you read the small print first, obviously Jordan is claiming he didn't even do this. When asked who had written this statement of truth/witness statements he claimed as I recall he didn't know. He didn't know because he had written them himself.
The Chief Constable of Stafford clearly states in this that letter Jordan hasn't committed a criminal act by knowingly signing false statements of truth and entering them into the court system. Remember the Wayne Rooney trial regards his agent or ex agent who had signed false statements and entered them into the court system. Both Lord Irvine and Falconer wrote to me stating that if I believed a crime had been committed in court it was up to the police to investigate it.
Now you can see yet again why the likes of HHJ Rubery baulked at going against the Bradford and Bingley, I have proved that DI Drake of Cannock CID and the company fraud unit from Staffs police lied in their letters to me when they claimed they had passed my file regards the criminal acts committed by the Bradford and Bingley to the CPS. Mr. Harry Ireland the chief crown prosecutor for Staffordshire CPS states in several of his letters to me that he has examined his paper records and electronic records and their is no record on the CPS files to show the CPS had received my file from Drake. Getting the pattern now.
On my making this FOI request to Staffordshire Chief Constable I received this reply telling me to get lost you are getting nothing from us. They couldn't provide me with anything because it would expose how rotten and corrupt these forces are.
This is a write up of a court case which shows Scotland Yard had set up a state created money laundering crime, set up to gain targets, as you can see the police set up companies on a 15million pound laundered budget to keep the sting going. Judge Bathhurst-Norman threw out the case that had been going on for five years and had cost the tax payers 25 million pounds. This is your money wasted.
Senior politcians, police/customs directors etc tell me when I have said about how I was forced to collect laundered money and forced to use false dual shipping invoices that I was a Walter Mitty character and this sort of thing just doesn't happen. HELLOOOOO are they going to say the same about Justice Rose in the LBC case and Judge Bathurst-Norman in this case that these juges are Walter Mitties also.
Why has not one of these officers been charged with perverting the course of justice and perjury in court?? is it because you charge me and I'll name the politicians or senior officers who set this sting up. Makes you wonder doesn't it.
I made a two taped cautioned statement at Cannock police station to DC Daniels, he had been ordered by his superior officers to take this statement from me. I also handed to DC Daniels and two fire arms officers a gun and two cases of ammunition that had been given to me by another officer, they had hoped I would be caught carrying this gun. I have the receipt from DC Daniels for the pistol and ammunition. I was cautioned on this part in case the gun had been used in a crime. Before taking the two tape cautioned statement DC Daniels had other officers search me for a tape machine, this was put in the officers log books.
During the interview with DC Daniels I named several officers involved in fraud and corruption, I gave him dates etc, I went through everything concerning the money laundering, false dual shipping invoices bent police/customs officers etc. At the end of the interview DC Daniels stated he would be following this through to the end. Some time later DC Daniels came to my home and stated he had been ordered by his boss's to drop his investigations made to him on my two tape cautioned statement. Names matter for politicians don't they. They will smear you and make you out to be a criminal even though you have committed no crime, their attempts to discredit you know no bounds.
I collected this two taped cautioned statement from the archives officer at Cannock police station, it was put in a safe place unopened until the time was right, now I am waiting for the honest people I was promised to open the envelope containing the tapes then they can be played to the general public to see what rubbish you have for police.
This is a letter I received from the Chairman of the old Police Complaints Authority, I had spoken to an ex special branch officer who had explained to me that when a Chief Constable orders his Professional Standards unit to hold a full investigation into someone's claims they have to be recorded in the Professional Standards Units record book and then by law the Chief Constable concerned must forward them to the PCA so the PCA can ensure a fair and unbiased investigation had taken place.
You can see in paragraph two of Mr. Grahams letter that he confirms that under the Police Act of 1996 that once Chief Constable Crew's Professional Standards Unit had carried out their full investigation into my claims they should be recorded.
In paragraph three you will see Mr. Graham confirms that once the investigation has been carried out by the professional standards unit and recorded it has to be forwarded to the PCA to ensure a fair and unbised investigation was carried out.
In a document shown later on this part you will see I received a letter from the Professional Standards officers used by Crew, they confirm they have carried out a full investigation into my claims and their report into their investigation has been recorded in the Professional Standards report book. I'll show this to be a load of rubbish later I'll also show Chief Constable Crew failed in his duty under the Police Act of 1996 to forward this recorded report on to the PCA for them to investigate.
This is a letter I received dated 12th April 2000 from Chief Constable Crew c/o his legal office, Crew had been handed tapes and documents for his attention at Lloyd House in Birmingham. Crew and his officers covered up the corruption within his force. The other officers mentioned were allegedly from the discipline unit, one of the officers DI Leary who met me was supposed to belong to the discipline unit of Crew's. This officer who spoke to me twice and contacted me by mail several times actually turned out to be a DI Leary forensic officer whose sole purpose was to cover up the truth of the forces corrupt officers and their actions. I have been given to understand that allegedly on Crew's instructions the BBC Panorama were contacted and given supposedly inside information of C division, the Panorama programme received the name of investigation "Gunta" from Crew and his officers. It was a total farce as will be shown in later documents on this site. All of the officers that were involved including Crew will be named with written evidence to back up the claims. The video of this program has been retained and it will show Crew, Ferris and others to be the whitewash merchants.
In 1991/2 I was informed by a criminal investigative journalist with a national newspaper that I needed to tape as many conversations with government authorities as I could, this included police and customs officers. I was also informed to keep three copies of every tape and document he had. This was good advice as in 1998 a burglary took place at my home. I maintain to this day that the burglars were either police or customs officers, a fact confirmed by decent officers.
I did tape conversations of both police and customs officers with the NISC. The conversations prove these officers were involved with fraud and corruption. Mr Wythe, legal officer for Chief Constable Crew was serviced with a file which was being used in my court case at Stafford Courts against both the police and customs officers involved. Mr Wythe personally signed for this file on behalf of Chief Constable Crew the service receipt was signed for and dated by Wythe. When the court time had run out for Mr Crew to reply to my court claim I applied for and received a court order signed by District Judge Isley stating that as the police had not responded to his claim he had won his case and could claim costs. Chief Constable Crew then sent a solicitor to Stafford court claiming that he Crew knew nothing about the claim and neither did his legal office (Gilbey and Wythe) and that he had not received the files from myself or the court. Needless to say the judges fell over themselves to reverse the court order.
Chief Constable Crew had five of my tapes transcribed. Many relevent words were described as inaudible by Mr Crew yet others who listened to the same tapes could hear every word clearly but the idea was to smear me from the beginning. On these tapes of officers that Chief Constable Crew was given they clearly show criminal acts having been commited and admissions of knowing crimes were being commited and nothing being done about it by either Chief Constable Crew, Joslin of Warwick police force or Chief Executive Richard Broadbent of HM Customs and Excise. Richard Broadbent had also been handed copies of the tapes of his officers that were involved and were signed for by his senior officer in the West Midlands. Innocent people are shown to have been jailed and though I sent relevant proof to the solicitors of these innocent people the solicitors wrote back claiming not interested.
I found out the hard way how corrupt the legal system is and how judges are happy to let solicitors and barristers lie and be in contempt of court, as the transcribed pages run into nearly six hundred pages a seperate part of the website will be set up for these to be shown. Around half of them were transcribed by Chief Constable Crew. Chief Constable Scott-Lee of West Midlands police force is fully aware of the tapes, documents and their contents. His deputy wrote to me stating the matter had been fully investigated and the documents and tapes were now destroyed that Crew had been given. When I provided Scott-Lee with documents in early 2009 Scott-Lee decided to run and hide and resigned.
I was advised to contact the Police Complaints Authority which he did. Then for four years they just gave him the run around. Eventually the year the PCA were closing down its Chief Executive Sir Alistair Graham wrote to me stating that Chief Constable Crew had contravened the Police Act of 1996 by Crews failure to forward to the PCA a copy of the report of the alleged investigation carried out by Crews officers Leary and Ferris into my claim. Crew was obliged to forward his investigation by law to the PCA so this authority could investigate and check that a fair and unbiased investigation had been carried out by Crew into my claims and allegations. Obviously the investigation by Crew was a total whitewash which is why he ignored the Police Act of 1996.
Chief Constable Crew couldn't forward a copy of his investigation into my claims to the PCA because he had conspired with his own officers to cover up the crimes committed. I received several letters from Crew stating his claims had been fully investigated but not once did any officer in Crews force ever take a statement from me, the officers I spoke to refused to accept any evidence of proof from him, in fact one of these officers DS Ferris tried to run off when I tried to hand him documents and tapes at Cannock police station which he wouldn't accept.
I was advised the only authority that could deal with Chief Constables was the Home Office. The replies from the Home Office on this matter from Clarke and co will be printed when the site is complete. If you wonder why this authority has become a total joke since 1997 you will see why in this authorities replies. Bliar closed the Police Complaints Authority down and set up the IPPC in 2004. On contacting this authority and sending its directors evidence of proof of his claims I was informed by the IPPC that any crime commited before 2004 when the IPPC was formed could not be investigated by this authority as shown in the remits drawn up by Bliar. How convenient for Bliar.
I had meetings at the Crown Prosecution offices in Birmingham where he handed to its Chairman/Chief Executive copies of the tapes referred to by Mr Wythe in his letter, I informed the CPS of the attempted blackmail by a solicitor Mr Morrissey who was duty solicitor for Warwick police force. I handed copies of the solicitors letters to the CPS at this meeting which confirmed the fact, I spoke of the involvement of a DS officer with the solicitor Morrissey. I handed copies of the tapes he made of his conversations with other CPS officers and the Office of Supervision of solicitors to the people he met at the CPS. I informed the CPS at the meeting of the fraud, corruption and perjury of the police and customs officers and again handed the CPS evidence of proof, evidence of proof was also faxed to the CPS director of the criminal acts committed in court by the Bradford and Bingley.
The response from the CPS director at the Birmingham office opposite Snow Hill station was he wasn't interested in what he was given and he didn't intend to do anything about the evidence I had handed him. Strangely shortly afterwards C division of West Midlands police force was disbanded for corruption, fraud, perjury by Chief Constable Crew and the director of the Birmingham CPS stated in the papers that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute one single officer. You must make your own mind up on this but I am more than prepared to back up my claims with evidence. Can the others do the same?
Letters and witness statements of truth and other statements made by customs officers involved will be shown on this site. Some have to be seen to be believed including letters from Chief Executive Broadbent, the Adjudicator and the Parliamentary Ombudsman Ms. Abrahams, all of which were faxed to Tony Blair PM and others including Lord Falconer.
Gordon Brown was faxed and sent evidence of the fraud and false dual shipping invoices being used to defraud the taxman and the involvement of customs in covering up these acts. Guess where Mr Brown sent these tapes and documents to be investigated? Yep, right back to West Midlands HM Customs and Excise to the very officers named on the tapes and documents to investigate themselves! This is the man who wants to be the next Prime Minister. Be afraid, be very afraid.
Since 1997 England has become more and more a police state. Laws have been passed by Blair and his cronies allowing the police to arrest or fine you without any little bit their evidence, this party would ask you to look into the backgrounds of Blair and his cronies, look into the parties they belong to and their strong beliefs, the communist party is alive and well in 10 Downing Street. You are now controlled in every decision you make for yourself and your families futures by Blair and co.
This party has a problem with the fact that all of your personal details are recorded on computer systems installed by American companies that were sanctioned to do so by Blair and co. WHY?
Look on websites named Police Corruption UK and Customs Corruption UK if you need proof. Some of the sites are actually owned and written by serving officers up to Superintendents. We can't all be liars or Walter Mitty's when we talk of fraud, corruption, perjury by officers and barristers. I was informed by the Lord Chancellors office that if the law locked up every solicitor, barrister and judge who lied in court they would need a prison the size of Scotland to hold them all. Says a lot doesn't it!
This letter above confirms Chief Constable Crew was fully aware of the contents of the tapes, bear in mind one of the above tapes mentioned was of Don Green senior officer with HM Customs NISC who was involved with DC Tim Green and his boss's from Walsall Road police station. Any one who has read the customs part on this site will see that James Scahill of Customs NISC was involved as was Huish of Customs. On these tapes can be heard Don Green stating every thing I have said is 100% kosher. Then why hasn't Bliar, Brown, T. Wright MP, Chief Constables etc been charged under (i) Concealing Offences Act. Part 319? they have all been given full evidence of the crimes committed.
There is further tapes and evidence being released for me, they will show further the extent of how Crew etc have lied and covered up for politicians and heads of police etc. This evidence was always available to these people if they had carried out a full investigation which no force or authority has ever done. Now they can find out through the public who can then make their own minds up as to who is telling the truth. I have asked to be arrested on several occassions in writing to the likes of Bliar and co if my claims are false. NO TAKERS.
This is a letter from Clarke when he was the Minister for the Home Office (remember this is the man that leaked the investigation into David Mills when Italian police officers had asked that their involvement be kept secret by Clarke) to Wright MP, this was in part reply to Wrights letter when he handed my tapes and documents to the Cabinet Office in October of 1999, I have stated several times I have never received a reply on this matter from the Cabinet Office which I never have this piece of paper is only worth using in the toilet to wipe your backside. It clearly shows Clarke is replying from the Home Office and not the Cabinet Office to whom Wright MP handed my documents and tapes to for Bliar to investigate the contents of. Clarke is clearly covering up for Wright and Bliar and co. You will see no mention of tapes by Clarke, you see no mention of money laundering from Clarke, you see no mention of the use of false dual shipping invoices by Clarke. NADA. Strange Clarke claims that Ministers cannot become involved in matters concerning Chief Constables, if that is the case then how come the Home Minister and Number Ten came down hard and became involved in the tragic Soham murders. PUBLICITY!
THIS IS THE SAME CLARKE WHO LIKE BLUNKETT AND REID ALL CLAIMED THEY HAD NOT ONLY LOST THE HUNDRED DOCUMENTS PLUS TAPES I HAD SENT THEM THEY HAD ALSO LOST THE SAME DOCUMENTS AND TAPES FORWARDED TO THE HOME OFFICE ON MY BEHALF BY BLIAR AT NUMBER TEN, BLIAR'S LETTER SHOWING THIS CAN BE SEEN ON THIS SITE.
They are so arrogant they believe they can whitewash anything. But no more.
THIS IS A LETTER FROM TONY WRIGHT MP DATED 5TH OCTOBER 1999
This letter from Wright MP confirmed he had handed documents and tapes of corrupt police/customs officers to the cabinet office on my behalf, he had stated he was going to give them to Bliar but changed his mind.
Wright MP demanded documents of evidence of the fraud etc which he was given in bundles. His secretary/researcher Susan Woodward was at every meeting I had with Wright, she was also handed documents and tapes.
Wright MP was given full details of everything contained in the letter to Mz. Abrahams the Parliamentary Ombudsman. Wright MP was given tapes on which a Mr Green customs officer with customs NISC stated on tape "the use of false dual shipping invoices is rife in the commercial sector of customs, this criminal act was committed to avoid paying English taxes". Mr Green stated on tape I would find the ICI would use these false documents. Wright was given copies of false dual shipping invoices.
Wright, to this date, 19th September 2009, refuses point blank to state what has happened to the evidence he gave to the Cabinet Office, Ed Milliband the Cabinet Minister refuses to reply to the Freedom of Information requests when asked for copies of the Cabinet Office investigation into these crimes by police/customs officers, companies etc.
The question this party has asked on many occassions is why has David Mills, husband of a Cabinet Minister Tessa Jowell never been charged for using false shipping invoices as exposed by Panorama? Is this why my documents and tapes handed to the Cabinet Office by Wright MP have never surfaced or been investigated? NOTHING WOULD SURPRISE ME WITH THESE PEOPLE!
LORD GOLDSMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, PRESIDENT BLIAR, TONY WRIGHT MP AND CHIEF CONSTABLE SWIFT HAVE ALL BEEN REQUESTED TO INSTIGATE AN INVESTIGATION INTO DAVID MILLS AND HIS COMPANY. NOT ONE SINGLE REPLY.
Both Bliar and Brown were handed documents and tapes of these crimes. Brown when at the Treasury actually sent the tapes and documents back to the very officers on tape to investigate themselves. You couldn't make it up if you tried. Bliar wrote to say he destroyed them all :)
I have spent nearly 12 years campaigning to have these crimes investigated, it has been cover up after cover up by both Tory government and Labour government.
YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN WILL NOW PAY THE PRICE FOR THE CORRUPTION OF THIS PRESENT GOVERNMENT. 1.8 TRILLION OF GOVERNMENT DEBTS AND THAT IS ONLY WHAT THEY WILL ADMIT TO, 1.7 TRILLION OF PERSONAL DEBTS, what a mess!
ALL DELIBERATELY ENGINEERED BY BLIAR AND BROWN AND THE REST OF THE TRAITORS IN THIS GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITIONS TO FORCE YOU THE PUBLIC TO ACCEPT THE EU AS YOUR MASTER.
In early 2007 this party stated in blogs on Sky business site plus other sites that by the end of 2007 early 2008 this country was going to be up to its neck in the brown stuff (these are going on site shortly)
If my party with limited resources can find this out why did the so called experts in government, banks, building societies, FSA and Financial Ombudsman sit on their hands and claim they knew nothing of the coming credit crunch, of course they bloody well did they engineered it??
I personally believe and I know others in government authorities believe this credit crunch has been engineered to firstly get themselves out of trouble for the trillions they have wasted and secondly to bring the public into line re the referendum.
Again on Adam Boultons site on Sky I stated I had been informed by an honest MEP that the reason Bliar and Brown refused us a vote on the referendum was because it had already been signed in June of 2007 by this pair of liars. I note that certain presenters are now airing the same view.
I REPEAT, GET OFF YOUR BACKSIDES AND DO SOMETHING OTHERWISE DO NOT COMPLAIN! IT'S IN YOUR OWN HANDS!
Letters and documents have been sent to the FBI and other government authorities. Now we will see who is honest and who is not.
Confirmation that Wright MP handed the tapes and documents to the Cabinet Office for the attention of Bliar. Looking into the background of Wright MP is very interesting, likewise Reid, Martin, Prescott and co.
My party has asked the question several times without getting a reply. How do members of the House of Crooks and its equal the House of bigger Crooks(lords) manage to buy large homes, then a second home, go on long expensive foreign holidays, go to the best events, pay out tax all on 64,000-00 pounds per annum. Its like when the mafia boss in a film whose name I can't remember on being asked by the Commission how he afforded so many homes etc replied "I have many generous friends"
Now we come to the true liars working on instructions from Chief Constable Crew, you see Ferris claims he was under the impression one of his colleagues was attending to the matter:) as there was only Leary and himself involved who is this other colleague.
Ferris claims the the issues I raised at my meetings with DI Leary and himself have been recorded and are on record in the Complaints and Dicipline division. Firstly I ask how did Leary and Ferris record my issues when no statements of truth were ever taken from me by this pair of clowns, no evidence of proof was ever taken from me by these clowns, all they were interested in was the names of the officers involved then shortly afterwards (c) division was closed down by Crew for the corruption and fraud by officers of this unit. NONE WERE EVER CHARGED.
I requested copies of the issues Leary and Ferris had investigated, get lost was the reply, I asked why Crew hadn't been charged under the Police Act of 1996 for failing to forward this recorded report by Leary and Ferris onto the Police Complaints Authority as he was obliged to do so. Get lost was the reply.
I was informed by a Deputy Chief Constable that i was a registered informant, I asked for copies of this fact, all destroyed was the reply from the Chief Constables, I requested copies of Leary's and Ferris's full investigations into my claims including the contents of the tapes. All destroyed was the reply. This is when you realise how high up the chain the corruption goes. You are in a police state and you had better accept it.
DS Baker who was in charge of this so called discipline unit wrote to me stating that he and other senior officers had listened to my tapes and found no criminal content, I let Baker reply several times to my letters in which he claimed I was talking out of my backside. I then sent hin a copy of the statement of truth that James Scahill of HM Customs had made and customs barristers had entered into the court system, Scahill named members of (C) division from Walsall Road whom Scahill had been in charge of these police officers, on receiving this statement made by Scahill, Baker suddenly resigned. Guilty conscience, nahhhhhhhhh he just did a runner and left somebody else to take the blame.
Chief Constables Gifford and Swift of Staffordshire police force wrote to me stating that they had liaised with West Midlands police force and customs, they had liaised with Warwickshire police force and it had been established I was lying. On requesting copies of this investigation by this pair of liars again standard get lost was the reply.
On making requests to these police forces under the Data Protection Act they keep your money but refuse you access to documents. Typical police procedure.
These people can make you out to be a criminal even if you are totally innocent, they forge statements, they alter statements, they commit perjury in court and for what, they want to climb the ladder no matter who gets hurt.